Log in | Jump |
Biomedical investment and business development chatter





Archives

This post was commissioned on January 26, 2009, and it was categorized as FDA/Regulatory, M&A.

Feel free to leave a comment below. Eben loves comments. You may also subscribe to comments through this RSS Comments feed or trackback here.

Pfizer, Inc.
Image via Wikipedia

In my last post, I gave five reason for Pfizer not to buy Wyeth and said I would be astonished if the deal actually went though.

Well… consider me astonished.

My favorite part of the press release is the part about a “cost savings of  about $4B” by year three.

Awesome!

So, let me get this strait, instead of addressing any of the immediate pressing concerns facing the company,  a major driver for the deal is a cost savings of $4B in three years.

Great job, you’ve  created a solution to a problem that doesn’t exisit pre-merger  (i.e., no merger, no need to save $4B) instead of focusing on things that matter (e.g., R&D productivity, patent cliffs, etc…).

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Theoretically Related Posts

This post was constructed by .

Eben is a highly caffeinated business development associate at a small, cash sensitive pharmaceutical company somewhere in Massachusetts. He enjoys cliche-less banter, compartmentalization, non-equilibrium thermodynamics and NPV analysis. Agree or disagree with what he's posted? He encourages comments.

If one were so inclined, one could follow him at any of these fine web 2.0 establishments:
_blank _blank _blank _blank _blank _blank _blank

Feel free to leave a comment below. Eben loves comments. You may also subscribe to comments through this RSS Comments feed or trackback here.

 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus