In my last post, I gave five reason for Pfizer not to buy Wyeth and said I would be astonished if the deal actually went though.
Well… consider me astonished.
My favorite part of the press release is the part about a “cost savings of about $4B” by year three.
Awesome!
So, let me get this strait, instead of addressing any of the immediate pressing concerns facing the company, a major driver for the deal is a cost savings of $4B in three years.
Great job, you’ve created a solution to a problem that doesn’t exisit pre-merger (i.e., no merger, no need to save $4B) instead of focusing on things that matter (e.g., R&D productivity, patent cliffs, etc…).
Theoretically Related Posts
- January 23, 2009 -- 5 Reasons Pfizer Shouldn’t Buy Wyeth and One Reason It Should (1)
- February 5, 2009 -- GSK Not Joining Pharma-mergerfest-a-palooza ‘09 (0)
- May 6, 2008 -- Bristol-Myers Squibb To Be Acquired By… [Insert Name Here]?? (8)
- March 10, 2009 -- Mega-mergers Are Not Good For Business (0)
- March 9, 2009 -- Merck to Buy Schering-Plough for $41.1 Billion Cash and Stock Deal (1)
- November 5, 2008 -- Another CB-1 Antagonist Bites the Dust: Pfizer Cancels CP-945,598 (0)
- October 23, 2008 -- No Rumors For You. Come Back. One Year (0)
- October 21, 2008 -- One Man’s Trash: Novartis Buys Nektar’s Pulmonary Division for $115M (0)
- October 20, 2008 -- Pfizer and UCB Announce Cyclofluidics: A Joint Venture (0)
- October 3, 2008 -- Swami Predicts ImClone’s Future (1)
blog comments powered by
Add New Comment
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)